How do transformer losses (iron/core loss, copper loss) impact energy efficiency?

Transformers play a vital role in transmitting and distributing electrical energy efficiently. However, like all electrical equipment, they are not 100% efficient and experience energy losses. These losses are mainly categorized as iron (core) losses and copper (winding) losses, both of which reduce a transformer's overall efficiency and contribute to operational costs. Understanding these losses and their implications is essential for improving transformer design, selection, and usage.


What Are Iron (Core) Losses in Transformers?

Understanding transformer losses is essential for improving energy efficiency, reducing operational costs, and ensuring accurate performance benchmarking. Among these losses, iron losses (also called core losses) occur continuously whenever the transformer is energized, regardless of the load on its windings. These losses represent non-recoverable energy consumption caused by the magnetic behavior of the transformer's steel core.

Iron (or core) losses in transformers are the energy losses that occur in the magnetic core due to alternating magnetic flux, even when the transformer is unloaded. These losses consist of hysteresis losses—caused by the reversal of magnetism in the core material—and eddy current losses—caused by induced currents within the steel laminations. Iron losses are proportional to voltage and frequency and are independent of load.

They are measured during the no-load test and contribute to constant operating energy consumption.

Iron losses in a transformer vary with the load current.False

Iron losses depend on voltage and frequency, not on load current. They occur even under no-load conditions.


Components of Iron Losses

Type of LossDescription
Hysteresis Loss (Ph)Caused by the lag of magnetic domains aligning with alternating flux. Depends on core material and frequency.
Eddy Current Loss (Pe)Circulating currents induced in the core laminations generate heat. Proportional to the square of voltage and inversely to lamination thickness.

Total Iron Loss $P{iron} = P{hysteresis} + P_{eddy}$


Mathematical Formulation

Loss TypeFormulaInfluence Factors
Hysteresis Loss$P_h = Kh \cdot f \cdot B{max}^n \cdot V$Frequency $f$, flux density $B$, volume $V$
Eddy Current Loss$P_e = Ke \cdot f^2 \cdot B{max}^2 \cdot t^2 \cdot V$Lamination thickness $t$, frequency, voltage

Typical Iron Loss Values

Transformer RatingVoltage (kV)No-Load Loss (W)Iron Loss % of Full Load
100 kVA11/0.4~300–500 W1.5–2%
500 kVA11/0.4~800–1200 W1.2–1.5%
2.5 MVA33/11~2500–3500 W0.8–1.2%
40 MVA132/33~15,000–18,000 W0.3–0.6%

How to Reduce Iron Losses

MethodEffectiveness
Use of CRGO SteelGrain-oriented steel aligns magnetic domains, reduces hysteresis
Thin LaminationsReduces eddy currents by increasing resistance
Use of Amorphous Core60–70% lower core loss than CRGO steel
Proper AnnealingReduces internal stresses and improves magnetic properties
Optimal Core DesignMinimizes flux leakage and ensures uniform flux density

Real-World Case – Low-Loss 11/0.4 kV Distribution Transformer

  • Rating: 250 kVA, ONAN cooled
  • Core: CRGO laminated core, 0.23 mm thick
  • Iron Loss: 550 W at rated voltage
  • Load Loss: 2400 W at full load
  • Efficiency at full load: 98.3%

Result: Reduced annual energy loss, saving ~$300/year in standby power compared to conventional models—achieved through optimized core material and geometry.


Measurement and Testing of Iron Losses

TestProcedure
Open-Circuit TestApply rated voltage to HV side, measure input power at no load
Wattmeter ReadingDirectly shows core loss under constant excitation
Loss CorrectionAdjusted for temperature and waveform accuracy as per IEC 60076

Regulatory Standards on Core Loss Limits

StandardCore Loss Provision
IEC 60076-1Specifies no-load loss limits by rating and voltage class
IS 1180 Part 1Indian standard for energy-efficient transformers
DOE 10 CFR Part 431US energy performance limits for distribution transformers

What Are Copper Losses in Transformers?

When a transformer delivers power to a load, current flows through its primary and secondary windings, both of which have inherent electrical resistance. This resistance leads to power dissipation in the form of heat—a loss referred to as copper loss or I²R loss. These losses increase with the load and directly affect transformer efficiency, thermal performance, and operating cost.

Copper losses in transformers refer to the resistive (I²R) losses in the primary and secondary windings due to the flow of current. These losses are proportional to the square of the load current and vary with the transformer's loading level. Copper losses increase the operating temperature, reduce efficiency under high load, and are the dominant loss component during full-load conditions.

Copper losses are dynamic and peak at full load, making them crucial in transformer efficiency calculations and thermal design.

Copper losses remain constant regardless of the load.False

Copper losses vary with the square of the load current. They are zero at no-load and maximum at full-load.


Components of Copper Losses

Type of Copper LossDescription
Primary Winding LossLoss due to current in the high-voltage winding
Secondary Winding LossLoss due to current in the low-voltage winding
Stray Load LossesAdditional loss from leakage flux heating structural parts

Total Copper Loss $P_{Cu} = I_1^2 R_1 + I_2^2 R2 + P{stray}$


How Copper Losses Behave

ParameterRelationship
Proportional To$text{(Load Current)}^2$
Zero AtNo-load (since current is near zero)
Maximum AtFull-load or overload conditions
Impact On EfficiencyReduces efficiency during peak loading

Typical Copper Loss Values

Transformer RatingVoltage (kV)Full Load CurrentLoad Loss (W)
100 kVA11/0.4~5.25 A (HV)1500–1800 W
500 kVA11/0.4~26 A4300–5200 W
2.5 MVA33/11~44 A (HV)14,000–16,500 W
40 MVA132/33~175 A (HV)90,000–120,000 W

How to Reduce Copper Losses

MethodImpact
Use of Larger ConductorsReduces resistance, lowers losses
Compact Winding DesignShortens mean turn length and improves cooling
High-Conductivity CopperImproves current flow with lower resistive loss
Lower Operating TemperatureReduces resistance (resistance increases with heat)
Optimized Flux PathReduces leakage flux and stray losses

Real-World Example – 1000 kVA Distribution Transformer

  • Voltage: 11/0.433 kV
  • Copper: 99.99% ETP grade
  • Load Loss at 75 °C: 6.5 kW
  • Full-load efficiency: 98.45%
  • Stray loss: 3% of total copper loss

Result: High energy performance under full load and minimal thermal rise, thanks to low-resistance winding design and enhanced core clamping.


Measurement and Testing of Copper Losses

TestProcedure
Short-Circuit TestApply low voltage to HV winding, short LV side, measure power loss
Wattmeter ReadingRepresents total copper loss under test current
Resistance CorrectionAdjust values to 75 °C (standard temp) using $R_{75} = R_t [1 + 0.004(T - 75)]$

Regulatory and Efficiency Standards

StandardRequirement
IEC 60076-1Specifies maximum allowable load losses for each rating
IS 1180Defines energy efficiency star ratings in India
DOE 2016 (US)Load loss limits for distribution transformers

How Do Iron and Copper Losses Affect Transformer Efficiency?

Transformer efficiency is the ratio of useful power output to total power input, and it’s primarily governed by iron losses (constant) and copper losses (variable with load). These two losses together determine how effectively a transformer converts electrical power with minimal energy waste. Understanding their interaction is key to designing, selecting, and operating energy-efficient transformers in any setting.

Transformer efficiency is reduced by the combined effect of iron (core) and copper (winding) losses. Iron losses occur constantly when the transformer is energized, while copper losses increase with load. The efficiency is low at light loads (due to fixed iron losses) and drops at high loads (due to rising copper losses). Maximum efficiency occurs at a specific load where iron and copper losses are equal.

Optimizing this balance is crucial for transformers operating under varying load profiles.

Transformer efficiency increases indefinitely as the load increases.False

Transformer efficiency peaks when copper and iron losses are equal. Beyond that point, rising copper losses cause efficiency to decrease.


Transformer Efficiency Formula

$$\eta = \frac{\text{Output Power}}{\text{Output Power + Iron Loss + Copper Loss}}$$

Where:

  • Iron Loss (P₀) = constant (no-load)
  • Copper Loss (Pcu) = varies with square of load current

$$\eta_{%} = \frac{V \cdot I \cdot \cos \phi}{V \cdot I \cdot \cos \phi + P_0 + I^2 R}$$


Loss vs. Load Relationship

Load Level (% of Rated)Iron Loss (W)Copper Loss (W)Efficiency Trend
0% (No Load)Constant0Efficiency = 0%
25%Constant6.25% of full-load copper lossLow – Iron loss dominates
50%Constant25%Improving
70–80%Constant~50–64%Maximum efficiency zone
100% (Full Load)Constant100%Slightly reduced
>100% (Overload)Constant>100%Drops significantly

Visual: Transformer Efficiency vs Load

Load (%)Efficiency (%) – Typical 100 kVA Transformer
00.0
25~96.5
50~98.1
75~98.6
100~98.3
125~97.5

Peak efficiency usually occurs between 60% and 80% of rated load.


Key Influences on Efficiency

FactorImpact on Losses and Efficiency
Iron Core DesignLow-loss CRGO or amorphous materials reduce constant loss
Winding ResistanceThicker conductors lower copper loss at full load
Cooling SystemMaintains winding temperature, prevents rise in resistance
Load ProfileAffects how often the transformer operates near peak load
Voltage RegulationHelps maintain consistent flux density and loss level

Real-World Case – High-Efficiency 500 kVA Transformer

  • Iron Loss: 850 W
  • Full-Load Copper Loss: 4300 W
  • Operating Load Profile: 60–80% daily average
  • Peak Efficiency: 98.65% at 70% load

Optimized for partial load operation, saving approx. 2000 kWh annually vs. standard-efficiency model—enabled by selecting a transformer where losses balance at typical load.


Design Strategy: Matching Load Profile to Efficiency Curve

Load Profile TypeSuggested Design Focus
Constant Light LoadMinimize iron loss (amorphous core ideal)
Variable Load (Peak + Idle)Balance both loss types carefully
Heavy Load/Continuous Full LoadReduce copper loss (larger windings, better cooling)

Efficiency Standards & Regulations

StandardEfficiency Provisions
IEC 60076-1Defines loss and efficiency testing procedures
IS 1180 Part 1Star labeling system for distribution transformer efficiency
DOE 2016 (US)Minimum efficiency thresholds by kVA class
EU EcoDesign Tier 2Enforces low-loss transformer designs in Europe

What Factors Influence the Magnitude of Iron and Copper Losses in Transformers?

Understanding what determines transformer losses is critical to optimizing performance, improving efficiency, and reducing energy waste. The magnitude of iron (core) and copper (winding) losses depends on multiple physical, electrical, thermal, and design variables. These variables affect how much energy is consumed internally—either through constant magnetic losses or load-related resistive heating.

Iron losses are primarily influenced by core material, frequency, voltage (flux density), and core geometry, while copper losses depend on conductor size, material resistivity, current magnitude, temperature, and winding configuration. Both types of losses are fundamental to transformer efficiency and operational cost.

Optimizing these factors during design ensures longer life, lower power consumption, and better thermal stability.

Transformer losses are fixed and cannot be influenced by design or materials.False

Transformer losses can be significantly reduced through better materials, geometry, thermal management, and design optimization.


Factors Affecting Iron Losses

FactorImpact on Iron Loss (Core Loss)
Core MaterialCRGO steel reduces hysteresis; amorphous metal cuts losses by ~70%
Flux Density (B)Higher flux increases both hysteresis and eddy losses
Frequency (f)Directly increases both hysteresis (linear) and eddy loss (squared)
Lamination Thickness (t)Thinner laminations reduce eddy current loop area
Core GeometryOptimized flux path lowers leakage and improves magnetic efficiency
Core AnnealingStress relief improves magnetic domain alignment, reducing hysteresis

Factors Affecting Copper Losses

FactorImpact on Copper Loss (I²R Loss)
Conductor Cross SectionLarger size lowers resistance, reducing losses
Winding ConfigurationCompact coils reduce mean turn length, minimizing resistance
Load Current (I)Losses increase with square of load current
Conductor MaterialCopper has lower resistivity than aluminum
Operating TemperatureResistance increases ~0.4% per °C, raising I²R losses
Cooling SystemBetter cooling keeps resistance low by limiting temperature rise

Interaction of Design and Operating Conditions

VariableAffects Iron Loss?Affects Copper Loss?Notes
Core Material✔ Yes✖ NoHysteresis and eddy losses
Conductor Size✖ No✔ YesLarger cross-section = lower resistance
Frequency✔ Yes✖ No (indirectly)Higher f = higher core loss
Voltage✔ Yes✖ NoAffects flux density
Load Level✖ No✔ YesCopper loss increases as load rises
Cooling Design✖ No (indirect)✔ Yes (thermal resistivity)Affects conductor resistance

Real-World Optimization Example – 2.5 MVA Transformer

  • Core: 0.23 mm CRGO, precision annealed
  • Windings: Multi-strand ETP copper, low mean turn length
  • Design: Flux density optimized to 1.5 T at 50 Hz
  • Result:

    • Iron loss: 1850 W
    • Load loss at full load: 12.5 kW
    • Efficiency @ 75% load: 98.65%

By selecting optimized material and geometry, losses were reduced by 12% vs conventional design.


Graphical Summary – Impact of Key Factors

Parameter ChangedEffect on Losses
↑ Flux Density (B)↑ Iron loss sharply
↑ Frequency (Hz)↑ Iron loss (linear and squared)
↑ Load Current (I)↑ Copper loss (quadratic)
↑ Conductor Area (A)↓ Copper loss
↓ Lamination Thickness↓ Eddy current loss
↑ Core Quality (Amorphous)↓ Total iron loss

Loss Sensitivity by Rating

Transformer RatingLoss Sensitivity
≤250 kVAIron loss dominates at low load
250–2000 kVABalanced sensitivity to iron and copper losses
>2000 kVACopper loss is major factor under full-load

Standards and Material Guidelines

StandardRelevance
IEC 60076-1Loss measurement and temperature correction
IS 1180Defines permissible loss values by rating
DOE Efficiency RulesMandates max allowable no-load and full-load losses
CRGO Grade M4/M5Specified for low-loss core designs
Amorphous Core Spec.Advanced low-core-loss alternative

How Can Transformer Losses Be Measured and Quantified?

Transformer loss measurement is a critical part of design verification, quality control, and energy efficiency certification. Losses must be accurately quantified using standard electrical testing procedures, both to validate compliance with efficiency regulations and to confirm that the transformer performs as specified under operating conditions. These tests are typically carried out in no-load and full-load conditions using precise electrical instruments.

Transformer losses are measured through two main tests: the open-circuit (no-load) test, which quantifies iron losses, and the short-circuit (full-load) test, which measures copper losses. These tests are conducted under controlled voltage and current conditions using calibrated wattmeters, ammeters, and voltmeters, with corrections applied for temperature and waveform distortion.

Accurate loss quantification ensures regulatory compliance, reliable operation, and performance benchmarking.

Transformer loss measurements can be skipped if manufacturer data is available.False

Actual testing of losses is mandatory per IEC/IEEE standards to confirm design compliance, ensure quality, and calibrate efficiency ratings.


1. Open-Circuit Test – Measures Iron (Core) Losses

ParameterDescription
Test SetupApply rated voltage to HV side, LV side left open (no current flow)
Measured WithWattmeter (P₀), Voltmeter (V), Ammeter (I₀)
RepresentsHysteresis and eddy current losses in the magnetic core
Constant ValueIndependent of load, depends only on voltage and frequency

Formula:

$$\text{Iron Loss} = P_0 = V \cdot I_0 \cdot \cos \phi$$


2. Short-Circuit Test – Measures Copper (Winding) Losses

ParameterDescription
Test SetupLV side shorted, apply reduced voltage to HV until full-load current flows
Measured WithWattmeter (Psc), Voltmeter (Vsc), Ammeter (Isc)
RepresentsFull-load copper losses (I²R) in windings
Load-DependentVaries with square of current

Formula:

$$\text{Copper Loss} = P_{cu} = I^2 \cdot R$$


Example – 1000 kVA Transformer Loss Test

Test TypeMeasured ParametersResult
No-Load (OC)V = 11 kV, I = 2.1 A, W = 920 WIron Loss = 920 W
Full-Load (SC)V = 560 V, I = 52.4 A, W = 7300 WCopper Loss = 7300 W

Additional Loss Components (Optional Tests)

Loss TypeMeasurement Method
Stray Load LossesMeasured by subtracting theoretical I²R from full copper loss
Dielectric LossObserved during insulation power factor (tan delta) test
Fan & Pump LossesIncluded in auxiliary power tests (for ONAF/OFAF/OFAWF)

Temperature Correction of Measured Losses

Loss TypeCorrection Requirement
Copper LossesAdjust to 75 °C using temperature coefficient (0.004/°C)
Iron LossesTypically stable, minor variation with temp

Corrected Resistance:

$$R_{75} = R_t \cdot [1 + 0.004 \cdot (T - 75)]$$


Standards and Instruments for Loss Testing

StandardScope
IEC 60076-1 & 60076-8Defines test setups, accuracy levels, correction methods
IS 2026-1Indian standard for loss testing and tolerance
IEEE Std C57.12.90US testing procedures for transformers
InstrumentPurposeAccuracy Class
Digital WattmeterPower measurement0.2 or better
Digital AmmeterCurrent measurement0.5
True RMS VoltmeterVoltage reading0.5
Core Loss AnalyzerOptional – for waveform and phase correctionsHigh

Real-World Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) Summary

  • Transformer: 2500 kVA, 33/0.4 kV
  • Iron Loss (No-Load): 1850 W @ 50 Hz
  • Copper Loss (Full-Load): 14,500 W @ 75 °C corrected
  • Efficiency @ 100% Load: 98.62%
  • All measurements within ±2% of design tolerance

Test results validated for export compliance under IEC and ISO 9001-certified lab conditions


What Design and Operational Measures Can Improve Transformer Efficiency?

In power systems, transformer efficiency is not just a design goal—it's a continuous operational concern. With rising energy costs and strict regulatory standards, both manufacturers and operators must implement proven methods to reduce losses and improve efficiency. This involves materials, geometry, cooling, operation, and maintenance all working together to minimize energy wastage.

Transformer efficiency can be improved by using high-grade core and conductor materials, optimizing magnetic and thermal design, reducing stray losses, implementing intelligent load management, maintaining optimal cooling, and conducting regular preventive maintenance. These measures reduce both iron and copper losses and ensure long-term operational performance.

Adopting these improvements can significantly cut lifecycle energy costs and ensure compliance with energy efficiency regulations.

Transformer efficiency is fixed at manufacturing and cannot be improved afterward.False

While initial efficiency depends on design, operational measures like cooling, load management, and maintenance can significantly influence actual performance over the transformer's life.


Design Measures to Improve Transformer Efficiency

Design StrategyEfficiency Benefit
Use of Amorphous Metal CoreReduces core loss by up to 70% vs. CRGO steel
High-Grade CRGO (M3/M4)Low hysteresis and eddy losses at rated frequency
Wider, Shorter WindingsReduces resistance and copper losses (shorter mean turn length)
Use of Pure Copper (≥99.9%)Minimizes resistivity and improves thermal conductivity
Thermal Optimized CoolingPrevents resistive rise from heat buildup
Interleaved LV-HV WindingsReduces leakage inductance and stray losses
Optimized Flux DensityBalances iron vs. copper losses for rated load condition
Rounded Core JointsMinimizes magnetic reluctance, reducing local core losses

Operational Measures to Maximize In-Service Efficiency

Operation-Based PracticeLoss Reduction Impact
Load Balancing Across PhasesPrevents overloading on one phase, reducing copper losses
Avoiding Undersized LoadsEnsures transformer operates near peak efficiency load range
Scheduled Oil and Filter MaintenanceMaintains dielectric and cooling performance
Fan and Radiator MaintenancePrevents excessive winding temperature rise (higher resistance)
De-energizing During Idle TimeAvoids constant iron loss in unutilized units
Voltage OptimizationReduces core saturation and stray loss
SCADA Monitoring IntegrationEnables real-time loss tracking and alarm-based maintenance

Efficiency Improvement by Design Class

Design ImprovementIron Loss ReductionCopper Loss ReductionTotal Efficiency Gain
Amorphous CoreHigh (up to 70%)None0.3–1.5%
Copper vs. AluminumNone~15–20%0.2–0.8%
ONAF Cooling System UpgradeIndirectMedium (via temperature)0.1–0.5%
Optimized Winding LayoutLowHigh0.5–1.2%

Real-World Upgrade Case – 1600 kVA Industrial Transformer

  • Original: CRGO core, aluminum windings, ONAN cooling
  • Retrofit: M4-grade CRGO, pure copper, dual ONAF fans
  • Efficiency @ full load: increased from 97.8% to 98.5%
  • Energy savings: \~5400 kWh/year
  • Payback: <2.5 years via reduced electricity bill

Result: Reliable long-term efficiency improvement with zero operational interruption.


Additional Efficiency Improvement Tactics

TacticMethod
Smart Tap Changer SettingsAdjust voltage under load to minimize overfluxing
Use of Low-Loss Magnetic ClampsReduces stray flux-related core losses
Digital Temperature ControlActivates cooling only when needed
Efficiency-Based Transformer SizingSelect optimal rating for actual load profile
Use of Tier 2/EU EcoDesign ModelsGuarantees compliance with the latest standards

Testing and Certification

StandardEfficiency Verification Scope
IEC 60076-1Loss and efficiency measurements (type tests)
IS 1180 (India)Star label assignment and max allowable losses
DOE 10 CFR 431 (USA)Mandatory performance thresholds for distribution transformers
EcoDesign Tier 2 (EU)Performance labeling for transformers >1 kVA

Conclusion

Transformer losses—core losses and copper losses—are key factors that directly impact energy efficiency and long-term operational costs. While core losses are constant and occur even at no load, copper losses increase with load. To enhance efficiency, it is essential to select or design transformers with optimized materials, precise manufacturing, and proper loading. Reducing these losses not only saves energy but also aligns with environmental and sustainability goals in modern power systems.


FAQ

Q1: What are the two main types of transformer losses?
A1: The two primary transformer losses are:

Core (Iron) Losses:

Occur in the magnetic core when energized, even with no load

Caused by hysteresis and eddy currents in the core steel

Are constant and related to voltage and frequency

Copper (Load) Losses:

Occur in the transformer windings when load current flows

Caused by resistance (I²R) in conductors

Vary with square of the load current

Q2: How do these losses affect transformer energy efficiency?
A2: Efficiency drops as these losses convert electrical energy into heat

At light loads, core losses dominate

At full or heavy loads, copper losses become significant
High-efficiency transformers are designed to optimize both loss types, ensuring low energy waste across varying load conditions.

Q3: What is the typical efficiency of power transformers?
A3: Modern power transformers achieve efficiency between 98.5% to 99.75%

Distribution transformers may have slightly lower efficiency (95–98.5%)

Lower losses = lower operational cost and reduced carbon footprint over the transformer's life

Q4: How can core and copper losses be reduced?
A4: Loss reduction techniques include:

To reduce core loss:

Use CRGO (Cold Rolled Grain Oriented) or amorphous steel cores

Minimize core flux density

Use thinner laminations to reduce eddy currents

To reduce copper loss:

Use larger conductor cross-section

Optimize winding design and layout

Improve cooling to maintain low resistance under load

Q5: Why are loss reductions important for utilities and industries?
A5: Lower losses result in reduced energy consumption and cost

Support green energy goals and regulatory efficiency compliance (EU EcoDesign, DOE)

Reduce cooling requirements, extending insulation and transformer life

Improve grid performance and power quality

References

"Transformer Losses Explained" – https://www.electrical4u.com/transformer-losses-core-and-copper

"IEEE: Guide for Loading and Efficiency Evaluation of Transformers" – https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8557080

"EU EcoDesign Transformer Efficiency Standards" – https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ecodesign/transformers

"ScienceDirect: Transformer Loss Optimization Studies" – https://www.sciencedirect.com/transformer-efficiency-research

Tags:

Picture of Norma Wang
Norma Wang

Focus on the global market of Power Equipment. Specializing in international marketing.

Get Support Now

Get a Quote / Support for Your Project

  • Don’t worry, we hate spam too!